![]() |
Metadata and Digital Repositories |
| the centre for educational technology interoperability standards | |
about the sig
SIG home resources
standards and specs about cetis |
Please note: this site is no longer updated. For the current Metadata and Digital Repository SIG website, please visit http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Metadata. University of Hull, 8 December 2003Report by Phil Barker A list of attendees and a summary of the evaluation returns are given at the end of this report. IntroductionPhil Barker gave an introduction to the day and to the aims and activities of CETIS. [Introduction to CETIS, powerpoint presentation, 62kB.] eLearning at HullChris Jesshope presented a technical and pedagogical overview of the University of Hull's eLearning strategy, including a discussion of problems which had been overcome and directions which future work might take. [eLearning at Hull, powerpoint presentation, 690kB.] Lipeng Wen, a PhD student with Chris, then gave a presentation based on his work to develop a schema driven methodology to store and manage related vocabulary terms using LOM/Dublin Core metadata. [Schema-Driven Methodology, powerpoint presentation, 102kb.] Jorum+ One Year OnThe Jorum+ project is funded by Jisc to scope out the requirements of a learning object repository for UK HE and FE. Steve Rogers gave details of the results of a user requirement gathering exercise which has been undertaken over the last year, and a summary of the functionality required of such a repository in the Jisc Information Environment. [Jorum+ one year on, powerpoint presentation, 126kB.] Long Term Retention of Learning ObjectsEd Barker gave a presentation detailing the metadata and repository issues which are emerging from a Jisc funded study he is engaged on into the retention of learning objects. One of the aims of the study is ensure that resources which have available for reuse remain available even regardless of whether the project which created them continues. Ed presented his ideas on how digital repository interoperability might facilitate this, and also discussed some of the barriers to this happening.[Long Term Retention and Reuse of E-Learning Objects and Materials, powerpoint presentation, 46kB] Standards and Specification UpdateLorna Campbell provided us with an update on new developments in relevant specifications and standards, including IMS Resources List Interoperability, IMS Metadata, IEEE LOM XML binding (the draft binding will hopefully be available soon), IEEE Digital Rights Expression, BS8419 (code of practice for interoperability between metadata systems for learning, education and training), the UK LOM Core and Identifiers for Learning Objects. Finder: the Learning and Teaching PortalMike Clark gave an introduction to the LTSN and Jisc collaborative portal project to harvest information about learning and teaching resources for Further and Higher Education and make them available through a single portal. Portal services will include agency mappings, funding opportunities, community fora, and resource discovery of both learning materials and advice for teachers; all will be described using the UK LOM Core. [The learning and teaching portal project: finder services, powerpoint presentation, 156kB.] UK LOM Core in intraLibrary 2.0Peter Douglas of Intrallect Limited gave a preview version 2.0 of intraLibrary, their learning object repository. New features for this version of intraLibrary include full support of the IEEE LOM, support for application profiles of the LOM (including the UK LOM Core, and the facility to display multiple browse trees based on different classification schemes.[UK LOM Core in intraLibrary 2.0, powerpoint presentation, 75kB.] User needs and metadata qualityBen Ryan of the High Level Skills for Industry project gave an entertaining talk about the metadata issues which the HLSI project has identified. While there are technical challenges, it was the human factors involved in ensuring the creation of quality metadata which had caused the most problems. Ben showed how assumptions about how resource creators would work and choices in the technology support for metadata creation could affect the quality of metadata.[Meeting User Needs and Metadata Quality, powerpoint presentation, 146kB Attendees
Evaluation SummaryA summary of the evaluation forms returned is available for those interested. Many thanks to all who attended, especially to those who gave presentations and to those at Hull who helped with the organisation. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maintained by Phil Barker and Neil Fegen. |